The Other Australia: Adelaide

Australia is the sixth largest country in the in world, only slightly smaller than the continental US. To think that visiting Sydney means you have “seen” Australia is like visiting San Francisco and saying you’ve seen the US, or even visiting Panama City and saying you’ve seen Panama.

Gradually I’m chipping away at Australia. I’ve been to Sydney and environs several times, and gotten to Cairns, Port Douglas, snorkeled on the Great Barrier Reef, visited Lizard Island, Darwin, and now have gotten to Adelaide, Bunbury, Fremantle and Perth. Although I’ve got a lot of ground still to cover . . . slowly I’m getting to see this amazing land.

Adelaide is a charming city and the capital of South Australia. Unlike Sydney, Adelaide was settled not by convicts, but by tradesmen and craftsmen from England, middle class folks who paid to purchase land in Australia. And it is pronounced Adelaide as in “laid back”. Sections of the city have beautifully preserved 18th century cottages and buildings. The Adelaide Arcade, a beautiful building, was saved from the wrecking ball and developed into the center of a four block, open mall area without vehicular traffic.

Haigh’s Chocolates, an Australian tradition: I still prefer See’s Chocolates, but, when in Australia . . . I came, I saw, I ate.

 

The traditional fences are made of brush that is woven together.

I was able to do a tour that got us away from the city, up into the “bush.” Bush in Australian just refers to what we call in the US the woods or forest. We were able to visit a national park with all kinds of “gum” trees, Australian for the many species of eucalyptus trees that grow in Australia. We visited a national park where we saw loads of koalas and kangaroos and wallabies.

I had no idea dingos were such beautiful animals!

One thought on “The Other Australia: Adelaide

  1. The word “BUSH” was first introduced after the early European Pioneers found difficulty in finding a correct definition for the vast areas of the New Zealand Flora.

    The word ‘Forest’ did not apply, since a forest consists mainly of tall trees. Likewise, the word ‘scrub’ was inappropriate, as this word denotes sparse plantings of low lying shrubs.

    So, after delving into the English language, these Pioneers found the word ‘bush’. Then, wherever their travels took them, they used this word to describe the woodlands. Hence today, as well as New Zealand using the word ‘bush’, so too is it used in Australia, regions in the Pacific, Africa and Canada.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s